| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 85.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2015-04-10 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.59 x 2.76 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 4.66 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminium and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 2600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
The Galaxy S6 Edge has a global score of 85.7, which is much better than the vivo X50 Pro's 75.4 score. Both devices we compare here work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S6 Edge has older 5.0 version and vivo X50 Pro has Android 10 version. Galaxy S6 Edge is an incredibly older phone than vivo X50 Pro, but it's somewhat thinner and incredibly lighter anyway.
The Galaxy S6 Edge counts with a much better screen than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px. Vivo X50 Pro features a much bigger storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy S6 Edge counts with a little bit better hardware performance than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has 5 GB less RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S6 Edge also counts with a 64-bits CPU and a graphics processing unit. The vivo X50 Pro captures greater videos and photos than Galaxy S6 Edge, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor providing a lower image quality, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photos and video and a way higher resolution camera in the back.
Vivo X50 Pro has a much longer battery life than Galaxy S6 Edge, because it has 4315mAh of battery capacity.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.