Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active is a little bit better than the vivo X50 Pro, having a 75.8 score against 75.4. Despite being the best device we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's design is a lot older, just a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker than vivo X50 Pro. Galaxy S7 Active features a brighter display than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater pixels quantity in each display inch.
Vivo X50 Pro features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4 GB more RAM and more cpu cores. The vivo X50 Pro counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the vivo X50 Pro also has a lot more mega pixels back camera and a bigger aperture.
The vivo X50 Pro counts with a much bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Vivo X50 Pro has just a little bit longer battery life than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4315mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.