Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-07-24 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 edge has a global score of 78.1, which is a little bit better than vivo X50 Pro's 75.4 score. The Galaxy S7 edge body is just a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter than vivo X50 Pro, even though it was released many years before. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S7 edge has a newer 8.0 Oreo version and vivo X50 Pro has Android 10.
Vivo X50 Pro has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a larger number of cores (and faster) and 4 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy S7 edge features a little sharper display than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel count per display inch and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
The vivo X50 Pro shoots better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a smaller sensor offering a lower image quality, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a larger aperture and a way more mega-pixels back camera.
The vivo X50 Pro counts with a very superior memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The vivo X50 Pro counts with better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a 4315mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.