Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S8 has an overall score of 81.7, which is a bit better than the vivo X50 Pro's 75.4 score. Samsung Galaxy S8's construction is lighter and just a little bit thinner than vivo X50 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before. Galaxy S8 has just a bit better display than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960.
Vivo X50 Pro counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy S8, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X50 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. The vivo X50 Pro counts with a way bigger memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S8, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The vivo X50 Pro counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S8, because although it has a tinier camera sensor taking worse quality videos and images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better photos and videos in low light environments and a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
The vivo X50 Pro counts with a superior battery performance than Galaxy S8, because it has 4315mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.