Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 Active has a score of 81.9, which is a bit better than the vivo X50 Pro's global score of 75.4. The Galaxy S8 Active is a older, somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker phone than the vivo X50 Pro. Vivo X50 Pro counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo X50 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy S8 Active has a slightly better screen than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater count of pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960. The vivo X50 Pro has a much better memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory.
The vivo X50 Pro has a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because it has an 8 percent bigger battery size. The vivo X50 Pro captures better photos and videos than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor giving a worse image quality, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a bigger aperture for better images and videos in poorly lited situations and a much more mega-pixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.