Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2021-03-12 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover 5 is a little bit better than vivo X50 Pro, with a global score of 78.1 against 75.4. Both devices we compare here have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy XCover 5 has a more recent 11 version and vivo X50 Pro has Android 10, so it provides the user some additional features. The Galaxy XCover 5 construction is somewhat thicker but a little lighter than vivo X50 Pro, and both were released with only 8 months difference.
Vivo X50 Pro has a bit better processing power than Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X50 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. The vivo X50 Pro features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2376px, a greater pixel density and a bigger screen.
Vivo X50 Pro has a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution, a back facing camera with lot more megapixels and a bigger aperture to take better captures in poorly lited situations. The vivo X50 Pro counts with a bit bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage.
Vivo X50 Pro has a very superior battery duration than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a 44 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.