Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 395 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is just a bit better than vivo X50 Pro, getting an 80.1 score against 75.4. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro design is noticeably thicker and much heavier than vivo X50 Pro. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has newer 8.0 Oreo version and vivo X50 Pro has Android 10.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a processing unit that is very similar to the vivo X50 Pro one, and although the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little sharper display than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a greater amount of pixels per display inch and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The vivo X50 Pro captures much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor and a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a way higher resolution back-facing camera and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition. The vivo X50 Pro features more memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little longer battery duration than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a 4% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.