Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a score of 81, which is a bit better than vivo X50 Pro's global score of 75.4. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy XCover Pro has 11 version and vivo X50 Pro has Android 10. The Galaxy XCover Pro design is thicker and somewhat heavier than vivo X50 Pro.
Vivo X50 Pro counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X50 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy XCover Pro and vivo X50 Pro have really similar displays, because although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a quite smaller display and a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of display.
The vivo X50 Pro shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a way larger camera sensor which gives a lot better photo and video quality, a much better (4K) video definition, a larger aperture to capture better low light images and a back camera with much more mega-pixels.
The vivo X50 Pro features a bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. Vivo X50 Pro features a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 4315mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.