Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is better than the vivo X50 Pro, with a score of 88.5 against 75.4. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a newer 12 version and vivo X50 Pro has Android 10. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip design is a little heavier but thinner than vivo X50 Pro, and both of them were released with only 5 months difference.
Galaxy Z Flip features a little more vivid screen than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels, a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display and a quite bigger display. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has just a bit better processing power than vivo X50 Pro. They have a 8 GB RAM memory and 8 processing cores.
The vivo X50 Pro takes a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates and a smaller sensor, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with a much higher resolution and a larger diafragm aperture.
The Galaxy Z Flip and vivo X50 Pro count with extremely similar memory to install applications and games, they have equal internal memory. The vivo X50 Pro features longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4315mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.