Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an overall score of 92.3, which is a lot better than the vivo X50 Pro's overall score of 75.4. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a more recent 11 version and vivo X50 Pro has Android 10. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G design is somewhat thinner but just a little heavier than vivo X50 Pro, and both of them were released with only 0 months difference.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit faster processing unit than vivo X50 Pro. Both of them have 8 cores and 8 GB of RAM. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit better looking display than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a bit higher 1080 x 2636 resolution, a quite bigger screen and a bit greater pixels density.
Vivo X50 Pro takes a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a tinier sensor which gives a worse photo and video quality and worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with much more megapixels and a bigger aperture for better low-light photography and video.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has as much storage capacity for apps and games as vivo X50 Pro, they have equal 256 GB internal memory capacity. Vivo X50 Pro counts with greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 31 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.