Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 11.22 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than the vivo X50 Pro, with a score of 90.6 against 75.4. These phones come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a more recent 11 version while vivo X50 Pro has Android 10, so it offers a lot of extra features. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3's construction is newer and noticeably thinner than the vivo X50 Pro's, but it's extremely heavier.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than vivo X50 Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Vivo X50 Pro features a slightly better display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2376, it also counts with a just a little higher pixels amount per inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3's memory for applications, games, photos and videos is very similar to vivo X50 Pro's one, both have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory capacity. The vivo X50 Pro captures much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a way higher resolution camera and a lot larger camera aperture to take better low-light images and videos.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity against 4315mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.