Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Sony |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2017-06-01 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.14 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black, Pink, Red and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 801 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3230mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia XZ Premium has a global score of 79.8, which is just a bit better than vivo X50 Pro's 75.4 general score. Despite of the fact the Xperia XZ Premium is much older and just a bit heavier than the vivo X50 Pro, it's construction is still a little thinner. Vivo X50 Pro has a bit more powerful processing unit than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X50 Pro also has more RAM.
The Xperia XZ Premium has an incredibly better screen than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much better 2160 x 3840 resolution and a much better pixel density. The vivo X50 Pro captures slightly better pictures and videos than Xperia XZ Premium, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor capturing less light and dull colors, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a bigger camera aperture and a much more mega pixels back-facing camera.
Vivo X50 Pro features a very superior storage for games and applications than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Vivo X50 Pro counts with improved battery performance than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, because it has a 34% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.