Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Sony |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-07-24 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Alpha grey | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ2 Compact has an overall score of 79, which is a bit better than the vivo X50 Pro's general score of 75.4. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Xperia XZ2 Compact has the newer 8.0 Oreo version and vivo X50 Pro has Android 10. Although the Xperia XZ2 Compact is noticeably older and incredibly thicker than vivo X50 Pro, it's construction is still just a bit lighter.
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact features a more vivid screen than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a really smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2160px resolution, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the display. The vivo X50 Pro features more memory to store more games and applications than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact features just a little better hardware performance than vivo X50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. Vivo X50 Pro features a much better battery performance than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 4315mAh battery size instead of 2870mAh.
Vivo X50 Pro has a slightly better camera than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has a tinier sensor taking worse quality videos and photographs and slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.