Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Sony |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2018-07-30 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Alpha grey | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 760 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium has an overall score of 82.2, which is just a bit better than the vivo X50 Pro's score of 75.4. Although it's the best in this comparison review, Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium is an older, incredibly thicker and heavier phone than vivo X50 Pro. The Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with a bit superior processing unit than vivo X50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Xperia XZ2 Premium has an incredibly better looking display than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot greater screen pixel density and a lot better resolution of 2160 x 3840px. The vivo X50 Pro shoots a bit better videos and photos than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because although it has a smaller sensor shooting lower quality photographs and videos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a way more mega pixels camera in the back and a larger camera aperture.
The vivo X50 Pro has a greater storage for apps and games than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Vivo X50 Pro features better battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has a 22% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.