Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Sony |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2015-06-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia Z4v has an overall score of 78.8, which is slightly better than the vivo X50 Pro's 75.4 global score. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Xperia Z4v has 5.1 version while vivo X50 Pro has Android 10 version. Although the Xperia Z4v is incredibly older and just a little thicker than the vivo X50 Pro, it's construction is still lighter.
Xperia Z4v features a sharper display than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a higher display density and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels. Vivo X50 Pro features a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Sony Xperia Z4v, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Xperia Z4v and vivo X50 Pro count with similar CPUs, because although the Xperia Z4v has 5 GB lesser RAM memory, and they both have 8 cores, it also counts with a graphics co-processor. The vivo X50 Pro features a much longer battery duration than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has 4315mAh of battery capacity.
The vivo X50 Pro captures slightly better photographs and videos than Sony Xperia Z4v, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing less light and washed colors, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a larger aperture for better low light captures and videos and a camera with way more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.