Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Vivo |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a bit better than vivo X50 Pro, having a overall score of 77.8 against 75.4. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro body is much newer and notably thinner, but also somewhat heavier than the vivo X50 Pro. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a newer 14 version while vivo X50 Pro has Android 10 version.
Vivo X50 Pro has a much greater hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much more vibrant display than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a much better resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels, a bigger screen and a quite better pixel density.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a better camera than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light images and videos, it also counts with a much higher video resolution, a way larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot better quality photos and a back camera with more megapixels.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo X50 Pro, because it has 512 GB internal storage. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has longer battery lifetime than vivo X50 Pro, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity against 4315mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.