Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-07-24 | 2018-04-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.36 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark has a score of 80.4, which is a little bit better than vivo X50 Pro's global score of 75.4. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Black Shark has newer 9.0 Pie version and vivo X50 Pro has Android 10 version. Even being the best in this comparison review, it must be noted that it's also a noticeably older, a little heavier and somewhat thicker device.
The Xiaomi Black Shark has just a bit better performance than vivo X50 Pro. They have 8 processing cores and a 8 GB RAM memory. Xiaomi Black Shark counts with a bit sharper screen than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2160, it also counts with a little better count of pixels per display inch.
Vivo X50 Pro captures better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the vivo X50 Pro also has a larger sensor providing a better image quality, a bigger aperture to capture better photography and videos in low light situations and a camera with a lot higher resolution.
Vivo X50 Pro has a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Vivo X50 Pro counts with just a bit better battery life than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has 4315mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.