Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a global score of 86.6, which is much better than vivo X50 Pro's 75.4 overall score. Both phones we are comparing include the same Android 10 operating system, so both of them should offer very similar OS features. Despite being the best cellphone in this comparison review, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 construction is somewhat heavier and extremely thicker than the vivo X50 Pro.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a display that's just as good as the display in vivo X50 Pro, because although the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a just a little lower number of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little bigger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400px resolution. The vivo X50 Pro features a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a little bit better processing power than vivo X50 Pro. They have 8 GB of RAM and 8 CPU cores. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with a better camera than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for capturing photos and videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also counts with higher video frame rate, a back facing camera with a way better 64 MP resolution and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a little better battery performance than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a 9% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.