Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2022-04-04 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4650mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro is slightly better than vivo X50 Pro, with a 78.7 score against 75.4. The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro design is newer, but heavier and somewhat thicker than the vivo X50 Pro. Both phones we compare here come with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro has a more recent 12 version while vivo X50 Pro has Android 10, offering a couple additional features and some performance improvements.
Vivo X50 Pro counts with a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2376 resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better pixels amount in each inch of screen. Vivo X50 Pro features a much more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro. Both of them have 8 CPU cores and a 8 GB RAM memory.
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro has a superior camera than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low-light images and video and a smaller sensor shooting worse quality photographs, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro also counts with higher 60 fps video frame rates and a much better 108 MP resolution back-facing camera.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro counts with as much storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as vivo X50 Pro, they have equal 256 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro has a bit superior battery life than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a 4650mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.