Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.32 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Citrus Yellow, Mint Green and Truffle Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 5 nm (Quad-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 642 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4250mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite is better than vivo X50 Pro, getting an 85 score against 75.4. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite design is newer, somewhat thinner and lighter than the vivo X50 Pro. Both devices in this comparison review include Android operating system, but Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite has a more recent 11 version while vivo X50 Pro has Android 10.
Vivo X50 Pro has a little better performance than Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite, because it has 4 more cores and more RAM memory. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite has a bit more vivid display than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater pixels density and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The vivo X50 Pro counts with a much greater memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite's battery performance is very similar to the vivo X50 Pro one, although the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite has just 4250mAh battery size. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite takes a bit better videos and photos than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for capturing photos or videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite also counts with a camera in the back with much more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.