Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2021-03-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 8.25 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Ceramic Black and Ceramic White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 516 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 8.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has a score of 90.7, which is much better than vivo X50 Pro's score of 75.4. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra is better than vivo X50 Pro, it must be noted that it's also a just a little bit thicker and way heavier phone. Both phones in this comparison review have Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has a more recent 11 version and vivo X50 Pro has Android 10.
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with a lot better looking screen than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a better 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution, more pixels per screen inch and a bit larger screen. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with just a little better hardware performance than vivo X50 Pro. Both have the same number of cores and a 8 GB RAM.
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with a much better camera than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light images and video, it also counts with a more mega-pixels back-facing camera, a much higher video quality and a way larger sensor providing a way better image quality.
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with as much memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as the vivo X50 Pro one, both have exactly the same internal memory. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with superior battery life than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a 16% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.