Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-07-24 | 2018-06-05 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.10 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black, Blue, Gold and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2248 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 56.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 8 is much better than the vivo X50 Pro, having an 83.3 score against 75.4. Although the Xiaomi Mi 8 is noticeably older than the vivo X50 Pro, it's construction is a little thinner and a little bit lighter. Both phones in this comparison come with the same Android 10 OS (operating system).
The Xiaomi Mi 8 counts with a bit more powerful CPU than vivo X50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Xiaomi Mi 8 counts with a bit better looking display than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2248px and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little greater number of pixels per inch in the display.
Vivo X50 Pro takes better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi 8, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor which provides a worse image and video quality, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera and a larger aperture for better images and video in low light environments.
The Xiaomi Mi 8 and vivo X50 Pro count with extremely similar storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, both of them have exactly the same 256 GB internal storage. Vivo X50 Pro counts with superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 8, because it has a 27% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.