Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 83.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-03-06 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.20 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.10 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black, Blue and Purple |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9 is better than vivo X50 Pro, having an 83.2 score against 75.4. Even though the Xiaomi Mi 9 is older than vivo X50 Pro, it's construction is a little bit lighter and just a little thinner. The Xiaomi Mi 9 counts with a little faster processor than vivo X50 Pro, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 has a bit sharper display than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a quite better pixel number per inch of display. Xiaomi Mi 9 features a bit better camera than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for taking images and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have a same resolution back facing camera and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Mi 9 also counts with faster video frame rates and a way larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
The vivo X50 Pro has a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The vivo X50 Pro has better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 9, because it has 4315mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.