Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-06-17 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9T has an overall score of 82.2, which is slightly better than vivo X50 Pro's 75.4 global score. These phones come with the same Android 10 operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding that. Even being the best in this comparison, the Xiaomi Mi 9T construction is older, a little bit heavier and just a little bit thicker than the vivo X50 Pro.
Vivo X50 Pro features a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X50 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Mi 9T counts with a bit more vivid display than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a just a little higher display density.
Xiaomi Mi 9T takes a little bit better videos and photos than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for shooting photos and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same video resolution and a same resolution camera, the Xiaomi Mi 9T also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing way better quality photographs and videos.
The vivo X50 Pro features a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. Vivo X50 Pro has just a bit longer battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has a 4315mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.