Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-07-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.13 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Blue, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 282 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4030mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi A3 is a bit better than the vivo X50 Pro, with a overall score of 79.2 against 75.4. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Mi A3 has the newer 11 version and vivo X50 Pro has Android 10. Despite of the fact the Xiaomi Mi A3 is older and a little thicker than the vivo X50 Pro, it's design is still just a little lighter.
Vivo X50 Pro counts with a sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a much higher 1080 x 2376 resolution, more pixels per inch of display and a little larger screen. The vivo X50 Pro has a little faster processing unit than Xiaomi Mi A3, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo X50 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Vivo X50 Pro has a slightly bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi A3, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 128 GB more internal memory. Vivo X50 Pro counts with just a little better battery performance than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a 7% larger battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi A3 takes slightly better videos and photos than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light photos and video, and they both have a 48 mega-pixels resolution back camera, the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Xiaomi Mi A3 also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.