Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2016-05-17 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.81 x 3.48 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Alpha grey | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 344 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8956 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4850mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Max is slightly better than the vivo X50 Pro, getting a 77.5 score against 75.4. Although the Xiaomi Mi Max is much older and somewhat heavier than the vivo X50 Pro, it's design is still a bit thinner. The vivo X50 Pro counts with a little bit better performance than Xiaomi Mi Max, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo X50 Pro also has more RAM memory.
The vivo X50 Pro counts with a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi Max, because it has a just a bit more pixels per screen inch, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2376 pixels and a quite larger display. The vivo X50 Pro has just a bit more storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Max, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB more internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Mi Max features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than vivo X50 Pro, because it has 4850mAh of battery capacity instead of 4315mAh. The vivo X50 Pro shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi Max, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the vivo X50 Pro also has a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back camera and a larger aperture to capture better images in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.