Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 87.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2021-03-27 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.91 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Arctic white, Deep Ocean blue and Night black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4520mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F3 has a general score of 87.3, which is better than vivo X50 Pro's overall score of 75.4. Both devices in this review come with Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Poco F3 has a newer 11 version and vivo X50 Pro has Android 10 version, offering a couple additional features and performance improvements. Although Xiaomi Poco F3 and vivo X50 Pro were released only a couple months apart, the Xiaomi Poco F3 construction is just a bit heavier but also a little bit thinner.
Xiaomi Poco F3 features a much better looking display than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a little inferior amount of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit bigger screen. The Xiaomi Poco F3 features a bit more powerful processing unit than vivo X50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Vivo X50 Pro counts with a very superior memory to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Poco F3, because it has 128 GB more internal memory. The Xiaomi Poco F3 counts with a little bit better camera than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low light captures and videos, and they both have the same video frame rate, the same (4K) video definition and a 48 mega-pixels back camera, the Xiaomi Poco F3 also counts with a way larger back camera sensor shooting much higher quality photos.
Xiaomi Poco F3 counts with a bit better battery life than vivo X50 Pro, because it has 4520mAh of battery capacity against 4315mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.