Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-07-14 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has an overall score of 78.7, which is a bit better than the vivo X50 Pro's general score of 75.4. These devices include the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't see any differences regarding OS features. The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro is a heavier and a little bit thicker cellphone than the vivo X50 Pro.
Vivo X50 Pro has a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X50 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM. Vivo X50 Pro counts with a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2376 pixels and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the display.
The vivo X50 Pro captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same resolution back facing camera, the vivo X50 Pro also has a larger aperture. Vivo X50 Pro features a bigger storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro features better battery duration than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4315mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.