Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-02-11 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X2 is a little bit better than the vivo X50 Pro, with a 79.3 score against 75.4. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Poco X2 has newer 11 version while vivo X50 Pro has Android 10. The Xiaomi Poco X2 is better than vivo X50 Pro, we must tell that it's also somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker.
Vivo X50 Pro features a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Poco X2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X50 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Vivo X50 Pro has a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2376 pixels, it also counts with a little bit higher number of pixels per inch of display.
Xiaomi Poco X2 shoots clearer videos and photos than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low-light images and video, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Xiaomi Poco X2 also counts with a much bigger camera sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality and a back camera with a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution.
Vivo X50 Pro has much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X2, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Poco X2 has just a bit better battery life than vivo X50 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4315mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.