Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has an overall score of 81.6, which is slightly better than the vivo X50 Pro's 75.4 general score. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC construction is somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than the vivo X50 Pro. These phones use the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any difference in that aspect.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a bit better looking display than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a quite lower pixels density, it also counts with a little bigger display and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution. Vivo X50 Pro counts with a bit more powerful processor than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X50 Pro also has more RAM.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features just a bit better camera than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light images, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor and a camera with much more MP.
The vivo X50 Pro has a superior memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has superior battery performance than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a 5160mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.