Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2021-03-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Frost blue, Metal bronze and Phantom black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro is better than vivo X50 Pro, having a global score of 83.4 against 75.4. Even being the best we compare here, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro construction is somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than vivo X50 Pro. Both devices in our current comparison work with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has newer 11 version and vivo X50 Pro has Android 10.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro features a bit faster processing unit than vivo X50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Vivo X50 Pro and Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro both feature quite similar screens, because although the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has a little bit less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little larger display.
The vivo X50 Pro features a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, because although it has a lot smaller camera sensor which provides a much lower photo and video quality, and they both have the same video definition, a same resolution back facing camera and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the vivo X50 Pro also counts with a larger camera aperture to capture better images and video in low light situations.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro counts with a quite bigger memory for apps and games than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1 TB. The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro counts with improved battery performance than vivo X50 Pro, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity against 4315mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.