Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2021-03-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has an overall score of 82.4, which is a little bit better than vivo X50 Pro's 75.4 score. Both of these devices have Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has newer 11 version and vivo X50 Pro has Android 10, giving some extra features and optimized performance. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro construction has the same thickness than vivo X50 Pro, but it's a little bit heavier.
Vivo X50 Pro counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X50 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a sharper screen than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bit larger screen.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro takes a bit better videos and photos than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a back camera with a way better resolution.
Vivo X50 Pro has a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with better battery lifetime than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a 16 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.