Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-07-24 | -- |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a global score of 77.1, which is a little bit better than the vivo X50 Pro's 75.4 overall score. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has newer 11 version and vivo X50 Pro has Android 10 version, so it counts with a lot of extra features and some performance improvements. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G body has the same thickness than the vivo X50 Pro, but it is somewhat heavier.
The vivo X50 Pro has a much better performing processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X50 Pro also has more RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features a better screen than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a little bigger display, a higher resolution of 2080 x 2400 pixels and a little better quantity of pixels per inch of display.
Vivo X50 Pro features a bit more memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with superior battery lifetime than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features just a bit better camera than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also counts with a camera with a way better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.