Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is slightly better than the vivo X50 Pro, having a score of 81.1 against 75.4. Both of these phones work with the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding OS features. Even though Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a better phone than vivo X50 Pro, we must note that it's also a somewhat heavier and a little thicker phone.
The vivo X50 Pro features a little faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X50 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM. Vivo X50 Pro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little bit worse 1080 x 2376 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a little better screen pixel density.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with just a bit better camera than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a way larger sensor providing a way better image quality and a back camera with a lot better resolution.
Vivo X50 Pro features a better memory for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features longer battery life than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a 16 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.