Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is just a bit better than vivo X50 Pro, getting a 79 score against 75.4. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has the newer 11 version and vivo X50 Pro has Android 10. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is a better cellphone than the vivo X50 Pro, we must highlight that it's also a heavier and just a little bit thicker cellphone.
The vivo X50 Pro has a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2376 and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater screen density. The vivo X50 Pro counts with a greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The vivo X50 Pro features a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X50 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has greater battery performance than vivo X50 Pro, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 4315mAh.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a little bit better camera than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for capturing photos and video in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same video frame rate and a back facing camera with a 48 megapixels, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also counts with a way larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.