Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Daybreak purple and Nightfall black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a score of 83, which is better than the vivo X50 Pro's 75.4 global score. Despite being the best in this comparison, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T is a just a bit heavier and thicker device than the vivo X50 Pro. Both of these phones work with the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't perceive any difference in that aspect.
Vivo X50 Pro and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T both feature quite similar displays, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a bit smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a bit greater quantity of pixels per inch of screen. The vivo X50 Pro has a quite bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Vivo X50 Pro has a little bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X50 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T captures just a bit better photos and videos than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs or video in low-light environments, and they both have a same resolution back-facing camera, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photos.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features superior battery lifetime than vivo X50 Pro, because it has a 16 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.