Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | ZTE |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-03-30 |
| 6.24 x 2.87 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.40 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Alpha grey | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4315mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
ZTE Axon 11 is slightly better than vivo X50 Pro, with a 76 score against 75.4. These phones work with the same Android 10 OS (Operating System). ZTE Axon 11's construction is a little bit lighter and just a bit thinner than the vivo X50 Pro, although both of them were only released 4 months apart.
Vivo X50 Pro counts with just a bit better processing power than ZTE Axon 11, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X50 Pro also has more RAM memory. ZTE Axon 11 features a display that's very similar to vivo X50 Pro's display, because although the ZTE Axon 11 has a little worse 1080 x 2340px resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of screen.
ZTE Axon 11 counts with a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than vivo X50 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 2 TB. The vivo X50 Pro takes better videos and photos than ZTE Axon 11, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a camera with a lot worse 48 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better photos and video in low-light situations.
The vivo X50 Pro counts with a little longer battery performance than ZTE Axon 11, because it has an 8% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.