Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 10 | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-10-23 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 6.66 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 12 Pro is way better than the vivo X50, having a 92.8 score against 73. IPhone 12 Pro's body is just a little heavier but a bit thinner than vivo X50, and both of them were released only 3 months apart. IPhone 12 Pro comes with iOS 15.x OS, and vivo X50 has Android 10 OS. IPhone 12 Pro counts with a better screen than vivo X50, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite better pixels count per inch of screen and a bit higher 1170 x 2532 resolution.
Apple iPhone 12 Pro counts with a superior processing unit than vivo X50, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and lesser processing cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64-bit processor. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro's storage capacity for games and applications is just as good as vivo X50's one, they have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Vivo X50 takes better videos and photos than Apple iPhone 12 Pro, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a same size camera aperture, the vivo X50 also counts with a much more mega-pixels back facing camera. Vivo X50 has a much longer battery life than iPhone 12 Pro, because it has a 49% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.