Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 10 | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-11-13 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 8.03 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3687mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max is much better than vivo X50, having a score of 93.2 against 73. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max design is just a little bit thinner but heavier than vivo X50, and they were only released 4 months apart. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max has iOS 15.x OS, while vivo X50 has Android 10 OS.
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max counts with a much better screen than vivo X50, because it has a quite bigger display, a just a bit higher screen pixel density and a little bit higher 1284 x 2778 resolution. IPhone 12 Pro Max counts with a superior processing power than vivo X50, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and 2 less CPU cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
The iPhone 12 Pro Max's storage capacity to install applications and games is just as good as vivo X50's one, both have equal 128 GB internal memory. The vivo X50 has just a little better battery duration than iPhone 12 Pro Max, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity instead of 3687mAh. The vivo X50 features a much better camera than iPhone 12 Pro Max, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and a same size camera aperture, the vivo X50 also counts with a back facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.