Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 91.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 10 | iOS 15.x |
| 2020-07-24 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Blue, Midnight, Pink, Red and Starlight |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3227mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 is a lot better than the vivo X50, getting a overall score of 91.5 against 73. Apple iPhone 13 is a just a bit lighter cellphone than the vivo X50, but both are equally thin. The Apple iPhone 13 has iOS 15.x OS, and vivo X50 has Android 10 OS. Apple iPhone 13 counts with a better performance than vivo X50, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster) and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
Apple iPhone 13 counts with a more vivid screen than vivo X50, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 1170 x 2532px resolution and a little greater pixels quantity in each inch in the screen. The vivo X50 captures better photos and videos than Apple iPhone 13, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same diafragm aperture, the vivo X50 also counts with a back facing camera with a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution.
Vivo X50 and iPhone 13 both feature very similar memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos, both of them have equal internal memory capacity. The vivo X50 features better battery lifetime than iPhone 13, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity against 3227mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.