Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 10 | iOS 15.x |
| 2020-07-24 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro has an overall score of 93.3, which is a lot better than vivo X50's global score of 73. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro design has the same thickness than the vivo X50, but it is somewhat heavier. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro comes with iOS 15.x OS, while vivo X50 comes with Android 10 OS.
The iPhone 13 Pro counts with a greater processing power than vivo X50, because although it has 2 GB less RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits CPU. The iPhone 13 Pro features a more vivid display than vivo X50, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1170 x 2532 pixels and a just a little higher screen pixel density.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro features as much storage to store more games and applications as the vivo X50, both of them have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity. The vivo X50 shoots much better photographs and videos than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light photography, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the vivo X50 also counts with a camera in the back with a much better 48 MP resolution.
The vivo X50 has a much longer battery life than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a 4200mAh battery size instead of 3095mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.