Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 949.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 Plus has a score of 87.1, which is much better than vivo X50's overall score of 73. The iPhone 8 Plus is a somewhat heavier device than vivo X50, but both of them are equally thin. The Apple iPhone 8 Plus has a little more vivid display than vivo X50, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little greater pixels density.
IPhone 8 Plus features a little bit better hardware performance than vivo X50, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and a lower number of cores and slower, it also counts with a 64-bits processor. The iPhone 8 Plus counts with a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than vivo X50, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
The vivo X50 shoots better photos and videos than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition, the vivo X50 also counts with a larger sensor capturing higher quality videos and photos, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better captures and video in poorly lited situations and a back-facing camera with much more megapixels.
The vivo X50 has a much longer battery duration than iPhone 8 Plus, because it has a 56% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.