Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS is better than vivo X50, having a score of 84.2 against 73. Apple iPhone XS is a just a little heavier cellphone than the vivo X50, but they are equally thin. Apple iPhone XS has just a bit better looking display than vivo X50, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater pixels number in each inch in the screen and a little bit higher 1125 x 2436 resolution.
IPhone XS has a little bit better processing power than vivo X50, because although it has an inferior number of cores and 4 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU. Vivo X50 takes much clearer photographs and videos than Apple iPhone XS, because although it has a tinier sensor taking less light and dull colors and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition, the vivo X50 also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture and a much more megapixels camera in the back.
The vivo X50 counts with much more memory to install applications and games than iPhone XS, because it has 128 GB internal memory. Vivo X50 counts with a much better battery performance than iPhone XS, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity instead of 2659mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.