Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel is slightly better than vivo X50, having an 80.2 score against 73. Despite of the fact the Google Pixel is way older and somewhat thicker than vivo X50, it's construction is still lighter. Google Pixel has a bit more vivid display than vivo X50, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
The vivo X50 and the Google Pixel count with quite similar storage capacity to install applications and games, both of them have the same 128 GB internal memory. The vivo X50 counts with just a bit better processing power than Google Pixel, because it has more RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
Vivo X50 counts with a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has a 4200mAh battery size. Vivo X50 takes much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel, because although it has a tinier sensor which offers a lower image and video quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the vivo X50 also counts with a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back and a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.