Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has a global score of 80, which is just a bit better than the vivo X50's global score of 73. Despite of the fact the Google Pixel 3 is older and just a little bit thicker than vivo X50, it's design is still lighter. Vivo X50 features a bit better processing unit than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X50 also has more RAM.
The Google Pixel 3 features a bit sharper display than vivo X50, because although it has a little smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2160px, it also counts with a quite higher pixels quantity in each inch in the display. Vivo X50 has much more memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The vivo X50 captures much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a tinier camera sensor shooting lower quality pictures, and they both have the same video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the vivo X50 also counts with a way more MP back-facing camera and a larger aperture.
The vivo X50 has a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.