Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a has a score of 78.8, which is just a bit better than vivo X50's 73 global score. The Google Pixel 3a body is somewhat lighter than vivo X50, although it is a little thicker and was released only 15 months before. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Google Pixel 3a has a more recent 11 version while vivo X50 has Android 10 version, so it provides you a couple nice extra features.
Vivo X50 counts with a little better processing power than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X50 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Google Pixel 3a counts with a little sharper screen than vivo X50, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2220 resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher pixel density.
Vivo X50 counts with a much better camera than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor capturing less light and duller colors, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the vivo X50 also counts with a larger camera aperture and a much more megapixels back facing camera.
Vivo X50 features a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The vivo X50 features a very superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.