Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a XL is a little bit better than the vivo X50, getting a overall score of 78.9 against 73. Google Pixel 3a XL's construction is a bit lighter than vivo X50, but it is a little thicker and was released about a year before. Both phones in our current comparison use Android operating system, but the Google Pixel 3a XL has a newer 11 version while vivo X50 has Android 10, so it provides the user some nice extra features and increased performance.
Vivo X50 features a little bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X50 also has more RAM memory. The vivo X50 counts with a bit better display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a just a little inferior number of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2376 pixels and a little bigger screen.
Vivo X50 features a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 128 GB internal storage. Vivo X50 counts with a little longer battery life than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 14% more battery capacity. Vivo X50 shoots much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a smaller sensor providing a worse image quality, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the vivo X50 also counts with a back camera with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution and a larger diafragm aperture for better photography and video in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.