Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a general score of 81.9, which is much better than the vivo X50's 73 score. Despite of the fact the Google Pixel 4 is older and a bit thicker than the vivo X50, it's construction is still a bit lighter. The Google Pixel 4 has just a bit better processing power than vivo X50, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Google Pixel 4 features a little more vivid screen than vivo X50, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2280 and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better pixels density. The vivo X50 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Vivo X50 features a superior battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity. The vivo X50 features a better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor taking less light and washed colors, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the vivo X50 also counts with a camera with way more MP and a larger aperture to take better captures in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.