Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-24 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL is better than the vivo X50, getting an 82.9 score against 73. Despite being the best in our current comparison, Google Pixel 4 XL's construction is older, just a bit heavier and a little thicker than the vivo X50. The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit better CPU than vivo X50, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Google Pixel 4 XL has just a bit better looking screen than vivo X50, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040px and a higher number of pixels per inch in the display. Vivo X50 has much more memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
The vivo X50 captures much clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier sensor, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the vivo X50 also counts with a larger aperture for better low light captures and videos and a camera in the back with a lot better 48 megapixels resolution.
The vivo X50 features just a little bit longer battery life than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 14% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.