Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-07-24 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.28 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.16 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Frost blue and Glaze black | Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a has a general score of 82.9, which is better than the vivo X50's score of 73. These phones have Android operating system, but Google Pixel 4a has the newer 11 version while vivo X50 has Android 10, so it provides the user a couple additional features. The Google Pixel 4a design is just a little thicker but somewhat lighter than vivo X50, and they were released only 1 months apart.
The vivo X50 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X50 also has 2 GB more RAM. Google Pixel 4a has a little sharper display than vivo X50, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater pixel quantity in each screen inch.
Vivo X50 features a much better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller sensor offering a worse image quality, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the vivo X50 also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels and a bigger aperture.
The Google Pixel 4a counts with as much memory capacity to install applications and games as vivo X50, they have equal internal memory. Vivo X50 has greater battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity instead of 3140mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.